2Q11 Comments 7/15/11

Excerpt from 2Q 2011 commentary. Always interesting (and sometimes insightful) to go back and see what one has said in the past. Dated 7/15/11.



“Hey, Let’s Be Careful Out There”
Despite a rather anemic recovery, and a distinct soft patch, the consensus is holding out that the economy will get back on track later this year. Markets have held up surprisingly well, especially given all the negative headlines (debt ceiling debate, eurozone crisis, austerity), but they are somewhat bifurcated with a few high growth names receiving super-multiples, while megacaps trade at a discount to the average. In spite of the potential for systemic risk as a result of global deleveraging from the debt supercycle, equity markets have been underpinned by solid earnings, attractive valuations, and low interest rates. Negative real interest rates make equities the best looking house in a bad neighborhood. In the wake of the Fed’s exit from QE2, it has indicated a watch ‘n see approach, while retaining the Bernanke put. The task for investors is to determine the likely path forward as cyclical tailwinds smack into secular headwinds. Will it be policy mistakes and blunders, or will it be political solutions and renewed confidence? Are we in a secular bear market, or the early days of a new bull market? In the relative vacuum of the Fed’s exit from the market, it will be interesting to see whether the market tests the downside to gauge the Fed’s resolve.

Amid significant structural problems, political decisions and policy choices need to be feasible and effective in order to put to rest concerns. That requires strong, decisive leadership. Something that has been missing, not only in the US, but also in Europe and Japan. The authorities are doing everything they can to kick the can down the road. There is an end of the road somewhere. We just don’t know where it is, or when we’ll get there. The market has not really been spooked by the lack of decisiveness, but at some point it may have no choice but to respond to whatever crisis du jour washes up on the doorstep. Everyone knows that the solution to our problems is growth (productivity based growth). But knowing the solution and reaching a solution are two different things. In the absence of real change, the likely result is more “can kicking”, and ultimately either inflation, deflation, or some kind of burden-sharing restructuring. The longer we go without resolving a number of fundamental problems, the greater the likelihood that the market will get caught out and we’ll be facing a lost decade for the economy. With the authorities almost out of bullets in both the fiscal and monetary realms, good options are fast diminishing.

Given the potential severity of the risk backdrop, there are relatively few signs of stress in global equity markets. Credit spreads across the spectrum have expanded, but are within bounds, the VIX volatility measure has increased recently, but is reasonably tame by financial crisis measures, and perhaps most amazingly, government bond yields show few signs of alarm (the obvious exception being peripheral Europe). Given the potential for contagion, this is hard to fathom. Not only that, but there has been an apparent disconnect between corporate earnings and the economy, which leaves one scratching their head. The essence of the current dilemma is knowing that there is an elevated level of risk at a macro level, but also knowing from history that there is a good chance we’ll muddle through. A consequence of this juxtaposition is a positive skew for equity markets, but with the possibility of binary outcomes. In the absence of a strong conviction related to better times ahead, and in deference to the large macro risks overhanging the markets, it seems most prudent to proceed with some degree of caution.

The problem when facing a binary outcome of unknown magnitude, direction, or proximity is that you can become paralyzed with fear. Even if you don’t like the economy, you don’t like current policy(ies), and you don’t like the outlook, when you take a step back and factor in low interest rates for an ‘extended period,’ then it is hard to resist the temptation to deploy capital. There is a huge opportunity cost to sitting on the sidelines and waiting for the big one to hit. In the longer term it may be the right move, but in the shorter term it is incredibly painful and frustrating. The potential pitfall here is that the authorities are forcing you back into the market, largely based on a monetary illusion. When the punchbowl is taken away, and/or one of the major landmines explodes, then the mask may get ripped off and reality laid bare. Easy money distorts reality through perverted incentives, leading to the misallocation of resources, and ultimately the destruction of capital. Like too much honey, it tastes good at first, but leaves you with a stomach ache. Contrarily, there is a tendency to be too sensitive to risk(s), especially in the wake of a financial crisis when our attitudes are anchored by our experience in the recent past. Overcoming psychological as well as real barriers is one of the tasks at hand.

There are many good reasons to be concerned with the current global economic environment, but there are also many positive factors outstanding as well. To list a few: a normalizing of megacap and financial sector valuations; highly accommodative monetary policy; ongoing economic recovery; strong emerging market demand; solid earnings; decent long term expected returns; a recovering banking system; the eventual bottom and rebound in property and construction, and lending. In addition, the outstanding reservoir of negativity lends itself to a market climbing the wall of worry. Renewed confidence of any form will propel the market higher. Investors should look through the overwhelming doom and gloom, and allow for the possibility of positive resolutions to some of the nation’s long term problems. And the fact that there are a lot of things that are weak, means that when they improve, good things will ensue. And let us not forget two other important factors. Firstly, we have already experienced a lost decade for equities, and within the scope of history another is unlikely. Secondly, human progress and advancement often take place in the midst of financial turbulence and economic difficulty. On a relative basis, with interest rates near zero, equities don’t look so bad.