Not sure whether I have mentioned this previously but was thinking about it this morning and figured I'd put the thought down.
Funds flow has all been into indexing and ETF vehicles over the past 3 or 4 years. ETFs are now the primary vehicle for many financial advisor and trader playbooks. This begs the question is the tail wagging the dog.
With investors hitting the ETF vehicle (sector, country, or other) before they worry about the underlying, markets are being buffetted by dull signals. Arbitrage keeps things in place, but the weight of money is coming from the macro side and it seems in keeping with the adage "shoot them all and let God sort them out."
A view of life, stocks, companies, the markets, and investing "through a glass, darkly."
Tuesday, December 24, 2013
Monday, December 23, 2013
Declaring Failure and Moving On
This is a very rough note. I think it could be fleshed out into a very meaningful article, but for right now it is just some top of mind reflections.
My underlying framework post-GFC was one where the business/investment cycles going forward was going to be more compressed (timewise) and more volatile. I was also heavily influenced by the new normal meme and how the economy was going to be stagnant as it worked through a balance sheet recession.
If I were to attribute a reason to that belief I would ascribe it to my ideological bias toward market economics and the belief that the market had not been allowed to clear properly due to significant artificial interventions. It was also heavily influenced by the recent traumatic past and the idea that modern markets/economies were more integrated, interrelated, more complex than ever before, and were consequently prone to momentum and cascade effects.
Financial marketwise this has not played out and I must declare failure and move on. I think the reason why financial markets have not reflected those beliefs is due in large part to hindsight bias and the massive trauma effected upon the psyche of market participants who endured the brutality and existential angst of a market implosion that could have gone even further. Investors have been fighting the last war. They have been overly pessimistic. They have been unwilling to give the Fed (or the govt) credit for stimulus. The market has climbed a massive wall of worry the whole way.
We are now at a point where the market is coming around to the idea that the Fed may have steered us over the canyon and to other side. The economy may be gaining sufficient strength to be self-supporting and a new cycle of more normal growth is going to ensue (even as the stimulus disappears).
That is the hope. We shall see how things pan out in practice.
My underlying framework post-GFC was one where the business/investment cycles going forward was going to be more compressed (timewise) and more volatile. I was also heavily influenced by the new normal meme and how the economy was going to be stagnant as it worked through a balance sheet recession.
If I were to attribute a reason to that belief I would ascribe it to my ideological bias toward market economics and the belief that the market had not been allowed to clear properly due to significant artificial interventions. It was also heavily influenced by the recent traumatic past and the idea that modern markets/economies were more integrated, interrelated, more complex than ever before, and were consequently prone to momentum and cascade effects.
Financial marketwise this has not played out and I must declare failure and move on. I think the reason why financial markets have not reflected those beliefs is due in large part to hindsight bias and the massive trauma effected upon the psyche of market participants who endured the brutality and existential angst of a market implosion that could have gone even further. Investors have been fighting the last war. They have been overly pessimistic. They have been unwilling to give the Fed (or the govt) credit for stimulus. The market has climbed a massive wall of worry the whole way.
We are now at a point where the market is coming around to the idea that the Fed may have steered us over the canyon and to other side. The economy may be gaining sufficient strength to be self-supporting and a new cycle of more normal growth is going to ensue (even as the stimulus disappears).
That is the hope. We shall see how things pan out in practice.
Labels:
business cycle,
cascade,
cycles,
forecasting,
investing,
Market Cycle,
momentum,
new normal,
psychology
Wednesday, December 18, 2013
More Than Just the Folly of Forecasting
"We have reached that time in the year where everyone is speculating about the prospects for equities in the year ahead. As usual the consensus is that the market will be up 10% in 2014. I have been an observer of strategists' estimates for half a century and I can tell you that as a group they always think the market will be up 10% in the following year whether stocks were up 20% or down 20% in the previous year."
- Byron Wien
There is something even more insidious here than just the folly of forecasting. The Mercenary Trader cuts to the chase in his breakdown of the mallady.
Think about the magnitude of what Byron Wien -- a guy who has been in markets longer than most traders have been alive -- is saying here. The collective Wall Street strategists who are bullish for the coming year are ALWAYS bullish. EVERY year. By an amount just enough to be respectable without getting them in trouble. So why should anyone care what they say or think? Their two cents isn't even worth two cents. It has negative value because it's a waste of time. They should be laughed out of town.
And why aren't consensus strategists laughed out of town? Why does the same crap get play year after year? Is there anything more irrational or lame than paying attention to utter bullshit, that has proven itself worthless, year in and year out, over and over again? Why do investors do it? Why do investors care about predictions that virtually never deviate from a standardized norm, and thus have almost zero information value?
A pet theory: It is in part because institutional investors are not the savvy, sharp group that biased product promoters and academic apologists would have us believe. To a large degree they are a group of underpaid (relative to the size of assets they manage) identikit MBAs in matching suits and ties, trying hard to avoid career risk while making decisions that don't get them fired. In the process of making those decisions, sticking close to the herd, or the established norm, is generally the safest thing -- and this "don't make waves" attitude is generally weak-minded, which leads to a weak-minded embrace of useless predictions as a pastime and a crutch. It's the same thing for establishment forecasters, by the way, which is why their predictions always cluster. The nail that sticks out gets hammered. Our general view is that, with a handful of notable and important exceptions, the supposedly high and mighty money management environs of Wall Street are actually closer to a bunch of drunks propping each other up via consensus embrace of mutually poor solutions and broadly irrational practices, not unlike the historically hidebound and sclerotic Japanese zaibatsu or Korean koretsu (big dumb corporate managements entrenching each other through cross-holdings of shares).
- Byron Wien
There is something even more insidious here than just the folly of forecasting. The Mercenary Trader cuts to the chase in his breakdown of the mallady.
Think about the magnitude of what Byron Wien -- a guy who has been in markets longer than most traders have been alive -- is saying here. The collective Wall Street strategists who are bullish for the coming year are ALWAYS bullish. EVERY year. By an amount just enough to be respectable without getting them in trouble. So why should anyone care what they say or think? Their two cents isn't even worth two cents. It has negative value because it's a waste of time. They should be laughed out of town.
And why aren't consensus strategists laughed out of town? Why does the same crap get play year after year? Is there anything more irrational or lame than paying attention to utter bullshit, that has proven itself worthless, year in and year out, over and over again? Why do investors do it? Why do investors care about predictions that virtually never deviate from a standardized norm, and thus have almost zero information value?
A pet theory: It is in part because institutional investors are not the savvy, sharp group that biased product promoters and academic apologists would have us believe. To a large degree they are a group of underpaid (relative to the size of assets they manage) identikit MBAs in matching suits and ties, trying hard to avoid career risk while making decisions that don't get them fired. In the process of making those decisions, sticking close to the herd, or the established norm, is generally the safest thing -- and this "don't make waves" attitude is generally weak-minded, which leads to a weak-minded embrace of useless predictions as a pastime and a crutch. It's the same thing for establishment forecasters, by the way, which is why their predictions always cluster. The nail that sticks out gets hammered. Our general view is that, with a handful of notable and important exceptions, the supposedly high and mighty money management environs of Wall Street are actually closer to a bunch of drunks propping each other up via consensus embrace of mutually poor solutions and broadly irrational practices, not unlike the historically hidebound and sclerotic Japanese zaibatsu or Korean koretsu (big dumb corporate managements entrenching each other through cross-holdings of shares).
Labels:
forecast,
forecasting,
investment strategies
Tuesday, December 17, 2013
When You Least Expect It...Expect It
The market hasn't provided an opening for a nice buy the dip all year. It has been incessant and merciless to the uncommitted...
...and it has proven Al Funt's maxim "when you least expect it, expect it."
...and it has proven Al Funt's maxim "when you least expect it, expect it."
Friday, December 13, 2013
Market Avalanches by Jim Sogi
Great analogy
Avalanche prediction requires the study of the snowpack both historically and how the snow structure has metamorphosed over time. One of the prime causes of avalanches are weak layers and slab formation. Weak layers in the snow pack are layers in the snow that cause the snow on top of it to slide off it and down the hill causing an avalanche. Weak layers can be low density snow or an ice layer or hoar frost flakes. Slab avalanches are created when higher density snow bonds together then slides on a weak on steep hill. Avalanches can kill.
Avalanches remind me of markets. You can study market structure historically by looking at the number of trades at a price. Over time the density may change. Market order depth structure is not available in full but could be inferred to some degree. Some parties have access to full book.
The theory is there are weak layers in the market structure that might cause a market avalanche or rapid rise. There may also be dense layers in the market structure. An example is a long bar with big price change but low number if trades. Time may change the number of trades at the prices or depth of orders might affect the reactivity of the bar. And a gap is also an example of a weak layer.
Avalanche prediction requires the study of the snowpack both historically and how the snow structure has metamorphosed over time. One of the prime causes of avalanches are weak layers and slab formation. Weak layers in the snow pack are layers in the snow that cause the snow on top of it to slide off it and down the hill causing an avalanche. Weak layers can be low density snow or an ice layer or hoar frost flakes. Slab avalanches are created when higher density snow bonds together then slides on a weak on steep hill. Avalanches can kill.
Avalanches remind me of markets. You can study market structure historically by looking at the number of trades at a price. Over time the density may change. Market order depth structure is not available in full but could be inferred to some degree. Some parties have access to full book.
The theory is there are weak layers in the market structure that might cause a market avalanche or rapid rise. There may also be dense layers in the market structure. An example is a long bar with big price change but low number if trades. Time may change the number of trades at the prices or depth of orders might affect the reactivity of the bar. And a gap is also an example of a weak layer.
Wednesday, December 11, 2013
Backfire
Taken from a SeekingAlpha article:
This phenomena is called 'backfire', and has been studied extensively by behavioral psychologists. The basic premise is that when confronted with facts that prove them wrong, opinionated individuals react very differently from the uninformed. Basically, instead of changing their minds and acknowledging the correct facts, they entrench themselves even deeper into their existing view.
This phenomena is called 'backfire', and has been studied extensively by behavioral psychologists. The basic premise is that when confronted with facts that prove them wrong, opinionated individuals react very differently from the uninformed. Basically, instead of changing their minds and acknowledging the correct facts, they entrench themselves even deeper into their existing view.
Labels:
behavioral finance,
investing,
psychology
Tuesday, December 10, 2013
Turn Off The Noise
Great advice from Charlie Munger:
"For decades I read almost all of The Wall Street Journal each day—and considerable portions of both The New York Times and The Los Angeles Times. I listened to the news on my ride to and from work, and at least a few times a week caught the national news on TV. By most common measures, I was clearly informed. But I was no wiser from it. All my wisdom came from my life experiences, my on-the-job observations, and the many books I started to read. Our job as investors is not merely to know what’s happening. We need to have appropriate context and perspective to understand the implications of what’s happening in order to make sensible choices."
"For decades I read almost all of The Wall Street Journal each day—and considerable portions of both The New York Times and The Los Angeles Times. I listened to the news on my ride to and from work, and at least a few times a week caught the national news on TV. By most common measures, I was clearly informed. But I was no wiser from it. All my wisdom came from my life experiences, my on-the-job observations, and the many books I started to read. Our job as investors is not merely to know what’s happening. We need to have appropriate context and perspective to understand the implications of what’s happening in order to make sensible choices."
Thursday, December 5, 2013
Why The Market Pays Up for Growth
Great comment from Jason Cohen.
"The market rewards growth over profit ONLY WHEN the market also believes there's a lot more growth ahead of the company AND when the other mechanics in the company are sound, eg. good gross profit margin and high long term value: CAC. Once a company is large and simple market expansion isn't how it will grow, they're betting on the development of stronger business models. This is the current bet on FB, P & TWTR."
I had always intuited this and so liked when I saw it articulated. Not rocket science, but sometimes stating the obvious is good.
"The market rewards growth over profit ONLY WHEN the market also believes there's a lot more growth ahead of the company AND when the other mechanics in the company are sound, eg. good gross profit margin and high long term value: CAC. Once a company is large and simple market expansion isn't how it will grow, they're betting on the development of stronger business models. This is the current bet on FB, P & TWTR."
I had always intuited this and so liked when I saw it articulated. Not rocket science, but sometimes stating the obvious is good.
Monday, December 2, 2013
Philosophy - Existentialism
Existentialism
-
the fundamental difference between phenomenology and existentialism is whether
the stress is placed upon existence or essence.
- existentialists accord precedence to
existence.
Christian existentialists or neo-orthodox = Karl Barth,
Paul Tillich, Rudolf Bultmann, Heinrich Emil Brunner, Rheinhold Niebuhr, Martin Buber
Soren
Kierkegaard (1813-1855) - three stages of life 1.) aesthetic 2.) ethical
3.) religious
Aesthetic stage:
hedonist in search of pleasure or an intellectual interested in abstract
philosophical speculation.
The
emptiness of ennui is an enigmatic inexplicable spiritual ailment which brings
man to the abyss of nothingness, entirely discontent with his existence.
Genuine
self-hood is not found in externals, but within, in passion, freedom, decision
and commitment, that is, in subjectivity.
The
chief distinguishing feature of the inwardness of the religious life is
suffering and faith
existence
precedes essence
Christ
is the Absolute Paradox (God incarnate)
Kierkegaardian
philosophy is fundamentally in direct antithesis to Hegelianism.
For
the existential individual all is in the state of :Becoming.
Martin
Heidegger (1889- ) - dasein (being there, human Being)
-
the basic mood of man is dread (anxiety),
and the fundamental structure of man is care (concern).
-
anxiety is caused by man’s encountering indefinable nothingness, evidence of
his finitude
Jean-Paul
Sartre (1905- ) - dealt with
dualism between subjective consciousness and objective Being
Man
lacks Being because there is no God to create Being.
-
man’s essence is freedom
“God is dead”
therefore we must rely on ourselves alone.
-
man is a useless passion vainly striving in a universe without purpose
Man
seeks to become more than Being-for-itself, he also desires to be
Being-in-itself.
-
the fundamental project of man is determined by his desire to be God.
Labels:
anxiety,
Barth,
Buber,
Bultmann,
dread,
essence vs existence,
existentialism,
Heidegger,
Kierkegaard,
Niebuhr,
nothingness,
philosophy,
Sartre,
Tillich
Philosophy - Neo-Scholasticism
Neo-Scholasticism,
Neo-Thomism
-
most contemporary Neo-Thomist philosophers are :Catholic
-
constitutes one of the largest philosophical schools in the world (administered
usually under Jesuit or Dominican orders)
Jacques
Maritain (1882- ) - existence
without essence would be impossible.
Humanism
secularizes by deifying man without admitting the necessity of God; it portrays
evil as an imperfect stage which will be overcome in the evolutionary process.
Weltanschaaung - Christian worldview
Etienne
Gilson - the revealed truths of the Christian bible agree with Greek rational
thought
Christianity
is an optimistic not pessimistic philosophy: instead of denying the existence
of evil it sets out to regulate ,combat and destroy evil because the universe
at its base is good not evil.
Labels:
Gilson,
humanism,
Maritain,
Neo-Scholasticism,
Neo-Thomism,
philosophy,
weltanschauung
Tuesday, November 26, 2013
Philosophy - Analytic
Analytic
Philosophy
20th Century school of thought, rejected traditional points; contend that
the entire business of philosophy is analysis, philosophy consists of
linguistic activity designed to eliminate problems arising from intellectual
confusion and this to clarify the knowledge which we already possess; a
non-metaphysical school of thought; a reaction against Idealism.
G.
E. Moore - method of posing
questions or problems to be analyzed, instead of postulating answers and
solutions.
Most
difficulties in philosophy are caused by “the
attempt to answer questions without first discovering what question it is which
you desire to answer”
-
the task is to analyze and clarify ordinary language.
-
the search for truth and discovery was replaced by the search for meaning and
clarification and the examination of language.
Bertrand
Russell - founded logical atomism,
theory that the world consists of a number of simple facts, each independent of
all the others yet related externally to the others.
Not
facts, but propositions are true or false; proportions are symbols, not facts.
Ludwig
Wittgenstein - in his later life he
broke away from previous thinking (picture theory: basic analytic
philosophy) and expounded a language-games
theory.
Tractatus - a proposition is a picture of reality...a picture is a model of
reality...a picture is a fact...the world is the totality of facts...the
totality of true thoughts is a picture of the world; thus language is a picture
of reality.
Later
life - emphasised that the way in which a word is used, not its meaning as a
name for some object, gives language and statements their validity.
John
Wisdom - philosophy is essentially
therapeutic activity designed to clarify the uses of language.
-
philosophers present us with old facts in anew light, but do not discover new
facts.
Oxford Philosophy - incorrect use of ordinary English is responsible for philosophical
problems, and these can be solved only by “pointing” out the normal usage of
the words employed and the normal grammatical form of the sentence in which
they appear. Ordinary language is
correct language.
-
concerned with the “elucidation of concepts”
and the “logic of expressions”;
dualism is the “dogma of the Ghost in the machine.”
Philosophy - Logical Positivism
Logical
Positivism
Logical Positivism - Moritz Schlick founder, active between the two world wars, known as Vienna
Circle, Scientific Empiricism, majority of members were mathematicians and
scientists, “Philosophy is a logical syntax,” “the meaning of a proposition is
the method of its verification,” Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico -
Philosophicus was a foundation.
Verification principle - to understand a proposition means to know
what is the case if it is true; the meaning of a proposition coincides with its
truth-conditions
- anyone
who wishes to understand a proposition must first know the conditions under
which it is true.
-
sense observation is necessary for verification
philosophy
was redefined as a mental activity which seeks to analyse or clarify the
meaning of scientific propositions (it is an active attempt to clarify
thought).
-
the propositions of logic and mathematics are tautologies, that is,
uninformative assertions which state nothing factual about the world (empirically
void).
- a
metaphysical proposition has no meaning because it is without truth-conditions.
Alfred
Ayer - empirical evidence is
necessary to determine the meaning of a statement or proposition, consequently
the nature of ultimate reality is not a legitimate topic for philosophical
consideration.
- it
is interesting to note that the verification principle is not itself verifiable
* value judgements are not permissible, therefore we cannot judge
one act morally right and another morally wrong.
philosophy = search for meaning, science = pursuit of verifiable truth
Schlick - knowledge must consist of structural relations which we all
have in common as a consequence of our private experiences.
Otto
Neurath - sense experience is a
biological process, not a mental state.
Correspondence theory of truth - an idea is true if it corresponds with its real object.
Coherence theory of truth-ideas are true if they consist of logical, integrated,
consistent, interrelated statements.
Rudolf
Carnap - protocol statements
(referring to immediate facts of experience).
- philosophy
is to be replaced by the logic of science, and the logic of science is nothing
more than the syntax of the language of science.
Syntactical statements are those dealing with form or order of the symbols rather than
the meaning of the statements.
Alfred Tarski - truth is predicated on sentences as a meta-language (a language which makes symbolic assertions about
another language).
Philosophy - Neo Realism and Critical Realism
Neo-Realism
and Critical Realism
Benedetto
Croce (1866-1952) - reality is thought (a progressive development which is both active and creative:
Neo-Hegelian) and philosophy is history (reality is identified with historical processes as it undergoes its
evolutionary course creatively and with freedom).
-
identified reality with self-creating mind; a self-creative mind alone exists.
- four
aspects of reality (art, logic, social activity, evaluation of the
past) inasmuch as reality is self-consciousness, philosophical activity itself
creates reality.
Neo-realism -
objects exist and their existence is not dependent upon any mind which happens
to be conscious of them; emphasised Epistemological monism (based on the theory
that the knowing process and the thing known are one and the same).
Naive realism -
the belief that real things are precisely as they appear to us in consciousness
egocentric predicament - the “difficulty of conceiving objects apart from any
consciousness”
-
they attempt to separate metaphysics from epistemology by proving that the
nature of real things is not found simply in the nature of knowledge. Thus the emancipation of metaphysics from epistemology
is seen as the “most notable” feature of Neo-realism; they have adopted a
metaphysical pluralism (the existence of a variety of real objects possessing
external relations to one another).
Critical realism as
opposed to neo-realism advocated an epistemological dualism (the representative theory that the knower
and the thing known are two distinct, separate entities, namely material
objects and ideas or mental states).
George
Edward Moore (1873-1958) - made a sharp distinction between consciousness and the
thing perceived as the object of consciousness; the object known cannot be
separated from the knowing process.
Bertrand
Russell (1873-1958) - aim of Principia Mathematica was to verify
the statements that all pure mathematics utilises concepts definable in logical
terms only and that pure mathematics follows from purely logical premises.
-
the existence of a real world beyond sense data cannot be proved.
Correspondence theory of truth - a belief is true if it agrees with the fact with which it is supposed
to correspond.
Scientism - doctrine
that all valid knowledge is attained through use of the scientific method and
that whatever cannot be known scientifically cannot be known at all.
-
values lie outside the domain of knowledge, they represent merely the venting
of emotions.
Alfred
North Whitehead (1861-1947) - reality consists of a
multiplicity of objects; the universe is always in process.
concresence -
process whereby this world of many things acquires integration or unity
Philosophy - Idealism
Idealism
Idealism - the universe is the embodiment of mind; reality is of the
nature of mind; ultimate reality as an entity transcending phenomena.
Metaphysical Idealism - a system which emphasises the analysis of
the entire universe as a psychic reality, postulating an ideal element
permeating all things, and philosophies depicting ultimate reality as
consisting of consciousness, mind or personality.
Epistemological Idealism - system which emphasises the identification
of reality with the “mentally knowable” data, the perceptible truths.
Platonic Idealism - ultimate reality consists of ideal constructs which are real.
Personalism - essentially American, originated in the works of George Howison
and Borden Parker Baone, “the doctrine that the ultimate reality of the world
is a Divine Person who sustains the universe by a continuous act of creative
will”
-
the conception of human personality as the key to reality, stating that the
ontologically real is personality: “life
is deeper than logic”
empirical
coherence is the criterion of truth.
Epistemological dualists = the knower and his ideas are distinct from
the object of his knowledge.
Absolute Idealism - the view of reality as the embodiment of the mind
Thomas
Hill Green (1836-1882) - Hegelianized Kantian thought, doctrine of relations (the reality of any object depends
exclusively upon its relations to other objects).
self-consciousness
- “the quality in a subject of being consciously an object to itself”
Francis
Herbert Bradley (1864-1924) - British, fondness for
paradox and contradiction, philosophy was a means of obtaining intellectual
satisfaction through discovery of ultimate truth.
-
the self is the sum of its experiences; “the
real, to be real, must be felt”
-
defined reality as the Absolute; appearance is fragmentary, relational,
changing; reality must be understood by combining appearances with awareness of
the whole reality in our experience; the ethical goal is fulfilment of the
self.
Josiah
Royce (1855-1916) - American, posited a real world “of outer and ideal
truth, a world of mind,” the Absolute is an all-embracing and overruling
spiritual Being.
-
unless there were Absolute Truth, there could be no error.
-
the very denial of truth constitutes an admission that truth exists
-
since error exists, there must be truth from which it errs; and since there is
truth, there must be a mind which possesses conscious knowledge of it eg. God
-
consciousness is knowledge aware of itself; since only ideas are knowable, then
that which is absolutely unknowable cannot possibly exist.
supreme good (loyalty) - “the
willing and practical and thoroughgoing devotion of a person to a cause”
Labels:
Bradley,
epistemological dualism,
Green,
idealism,
logic,
personalism,
philosophy,
reason,
Royce
Philosophy - Pragmatism
Pragmatism
Charles
Peirce (1839-1914) - founder of Pragmaticism, an essentially
American philosophy
Pragmaticism =
“the whole function of thought is to produce habits of action”
-
the rational meaning of a word “lies exclusively in its conceivable bearing
upon the conduct of life” ie.
speculative thought cannot be divorced from action
-
regarded pragmaticism as the logical application of Jesus’ principles “by ye
fruits you will be known”
-
the function of doubt is to stimulate thought and the purpose of thought is to
arrive at belief.
- a
belief is “that upon which man is prepared to act”
-
Peirce believed in a metaphysics postulating ontologically real objects.
Williams
James (1842-1910) - anything that is meaningful or real must have some
influence on practice, on our experience, and everything that has a practical
effect must be acknowledged to be meaningful and real.
-
abstract truths are meaningless unless they make a difference in concrete
facts.
-
the theoretical has value only when it bears upon the practical
pragmaticism
is both Nominalistic in that it stresses the concrete particular over the
abstract universal, and anti-intellectual in its stand against rationalism.
-
there is no room for metaphysical
speculations (ie. God).
Truth
must possess consequential characteristics, truths are created in a manner
similar to the creation of health and wealth; truth is a system of verification
(relative).
-
religious belief is good only if it has a direct positive affect upon our life
and actions.
-
evidence for God’s existence (truth)
is to be found in one’s personal inner experiences
John
Dewey (1859-1952) - built his system of Instrumentalism on the foundation
of Behaviouristic psychology; his views reflected those of organic evolution
and a faith in man’s capacity to achieve moral progress and a more nearly ideal
social environment primarily through improvements in education.
-
the proper ethical goals are the fulfilment of human needs and desires, the
continuous growth of human beings in moral sensitivity and human progress in
the practical realization of a better social world; absolute goods or evils do
not exist.
meliorist- believing
that the world can be made better solely through man’s initiative in bringing
about desirable consequences.
-
theory divorces from concrete action is sterile, empty and vain; moral
responsibility is social, “all morality is social”
God = the “active relation between ideal and actual”; the ideal
ends Humanism = an extreme form of Pragmatism based upon the concept of
the Greek Sophists that man is the measure of all things.
Labels:
Dewey,
James,
logic,
meliorist,
Peirce,
philosophy,
Pragmatism,
reason
Philosophy - Dialectical Materialism
Dialectical
Materialism- Communism
dialectical materialism: refers particularly the social philosophy known as Communism,
synthesis of Here’s dialectic and Feuerbach’s materialistic doctrines.
Ricardo’s
labour theory of value became the
fundamental thesis of Marx’s Das Kapital.
Karl
Marx (1818-1883) - wrote the Manifesto of the Communist Party (1848) with
Friedrich Engels (1820-1895), participated in the
revolution of 1848.
-
communism as the ownership of the means of production, abolition of private
property, labour theory of value (“surplus
value”); inevitability of profiteering and exploitation of labour,
scientific socialism, violent revolution, class struggle, dictatorship of the
proleteriat, achievement of a classless society, religion as opium of the
masses
-
Marx applied Hegel’s dialectic to socio-economic history ie. bourgeoisie (thesis), proleteriat (antithesis) leading to
classless society (synthesis).
-
His economic interpretation of history is known as historical materialism,
is based upon the doctrine of economic
determinism.
- a
particular society’s mode of economic production determines the nature of its
culture and social structure (Feuerbach had applied this materialistic concept
to social problems and cultural evolution).
-
owing to the dialectical nature of history [stages:
slavery-->feudalism-->capitalism-->socialism-->communism) each
historical period carries within itself the “germ of its own destruction”
-
the mode of production of material goods
determines the political, social, intellectual and religious life and
institutions of a given people in each era of history.
“it
is not the consciousness of men that determines their being, but, on the
contrary their social being that determines their consciousness.
communism - an ideal
system to be achieved by shifting control over economic resources from the
capitalists to the proleteriat.
-
since the labour of many workers is required to support a single capitalist,
members of the capitalist class are parasites living at the expense of the
exploited workers.
Labour theory of value - price of a product is determined by the amount of labour
expended on its production.
capital = accumulated surplus value; surplus
value = the difference between the actual cost of manufacture and its
selling price (net profit) or the unjust process of profiteering by using money
to earn money instead of working for such earnings.
profit = exploitation of labour.
-
the capitalist is unnecessary but the worker is indispensible for production.
-
the worker sells himself at a subsistence wage instead of the proper reward
which should include the surplus value.
- as
a result an inherent class war between the proleteriat and the capitalist
exists which can only be resolved through the overthrow of the capitalist by
violent revolution when “all of the workers of the world unite”
-communist motto “from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs”
-
all events in human consciousness are physical reactions aimed at satisfying
the economic and material needs of mankind.
-
morality is contingent upon the social class, and the social class along with
its moral code is in turn the product of the mode of production.
“human essence has no true reality” “matter thinks”
-
industrial and scientific work constitutes the highest form of activity, the
goal of which is the production of material goods for the enhancement of human
well-being
-
religion is an illusion, with the illusory happiness based on it needing to be
condemned. Religion functions as a
bourgeoisie police force, a technique to dissuade the masses from revolting by
promising them a better, happier life after death.
Vladmir
Ilich Ulyanov (1870-1924) - aka Nikolai Lenin, disciple of Marx, exiled
to Siberia, formed Bolshevik party in London, a staunch defender of
metaphysical materialism, his was a philosophy of history.
-
revolution was the leap from one stage to the next.
Mao Tse-Tung (1893-1976) - placed great emphasis upon (1) practice (the pragmatic element of
communism) and (2) contradiction
(conflict and revolution).
-
without conflict, there can be no progress
“All political power grows out of
the barrel of a gun”
-
the only valid criterion of truth is man’s social practice (condemned
philosophers for speculating, whereas
the task of man is to change the world).
- contradictions among
communists may be democratically resolved (“unity==>criticism==>unity”)
Friday, November 22, 2013
Philosophy - Classical Positivism
Classical
Positivism
Epiphenomenalism- the
belief that consciousness and mental phenomena are dependent upon and produced
by physical processes, but that the converse is never the case.
Henri
Bergson (1859-1941) - French biologist, most influential exponent of the
evolutionary school during contemporary times.
Bergson’s
vitalism-
life is an autonomous function controlled by its own laws instead of the laws
of physics and chemistry.
-
attempts to arrive at logical explanations of reality are ineffective because
reality is always in a state of Becoming and never stationary or at rest.
-
man’s intellect can grasp nothing except static truths (mathematics, logic,
etc) but his intuition can discern the ever changing life process itself.
-
the élan vital (vital impulse) is unpredictable and
perfectly free.
Dualism permeates
every phase of Bergson’s philosophy: in his metaphysics (mind and matter), in his epistemology (intelligence and instinct), in his ethics (open and closed morality), in religion (static and dynamic).
Static religion - set of myths devised by human intelligence as a means of
defense against the depressing experiences of life.
Dynamic religion = prompted by the elan vital, mysticism
Samuel
Alexander (1859-1938) - born in Sydney, neo-realist (objects of knowledge
and of sense experience are externally real in their own right and are not
dependent upon consciousness for their existence), the ontological real is
space and time.
Five
levels of emergent evolution (1) space time and the categories (2) primary qualities (3) secondary qualities (4) life
(5) mind (6) deity
- values
do not exist independently of the individual; relationship between subject and
object.
-
truth must be the coherent ordering of reality as the mind understands it, for
truth does not exist apart from the mind’s knowing it, nor does the mind
create it.
Auguste
Comte (1798-1857) - sort to revamp society for the sake of all classes,
societies salvation was to be contingent upon scientific knowledge; theology to
be replaced by a “Religion of Humanity”; sought a natural law of the history of
society; founder of sociology; God is humanity.
Anthropomorphism -
attributing human qualities to natural objects.
-
metaphysical causes or substances are not real; only the facts of sense
phenomena exist.
-
for us to attain immortality it is necessary to survive in the memory of those
who follow us.
- a
scientific law is a condensed statement about repetitive experienced facts
(Ernst Mach).
-
since “metaphysical realities” are assumed to go beyond the boundaries of sense
experience, they must be considered nonsense, nonexistent.
Labels:
anthropomorphism,
Bergson,
Comte,
dualism,
elan vital,
philosophy,
Positivism,
reason,
vitalism
The Market and the Economy Re-tethered
After a long period of apparent dislocation, I think the market is now re-tethered to the economy. As such it will rise and fall with the credit/economic/business cycle (all of which have reserves to go higher or improve).
Why?
The negatives and the positives seem pretty evenly balanced. Positives: strong momentum from wealth effect, sense of confidence flowing back into the system, no real signs of overleverage in the system, high earnings level, high profit margins, improving economic indicators (housing, unemployment, PMI, fiscal, output), low inflation, low interest rates, strengthening bank capital, strong credit growth, reasonable valuations, cash on sidelines, no real signs of hubris or greed, still a pessimistic undertone, Fed accomodation, low gas prices, China stabilizing, Japan recovering, Europe recovering. Negatives: political stalemate, above trend profit margins, slowing earnings growth, high earnings expectations next year, growing inequality, market up big, taper not far off, an underlying fragility, corporate leverage increasing, artifice masking underlying weakness, potential reversal of labor/capital trade-off, fiscal exit, stagnation.
The strong move in the market over the past year (with little pullback) indicates a market looking to the future positively.
Why?
The negatives and the positives seem pretty evenly balanced. Positives: strong momentum from wealth effect, sense of confidence flowing back into the system, no real signs of overleverage in the system, high earnings level, high profit margins, improving economic indicators (housing, unemployment, PMI, fiscal, output), low inflation, low interest rates, strengthening bank capital, strong credit growth, reasonable valuations, cash on sidelines, no real signs of hubris or greed, still a pessimistic undertone, Fed accomodation, low gas prices, China stabilizing, Japan recovering, Europe recovering. Negatives: political stalemate, above trend profit margins, slowing earnings growth, high earnings expectations next year, growing inequality, market up big, taper not far off, an underlying fragility, corporate leverage increasing, artifice masking underlying weakness, potential reversal of labor/capital trade-off, fiscal exit, stagnation.
The strong move in the market over the past year (with little pullback) indicates a market looking to the future positively.
Tuesday, November 19, 2013
Philosophy - Evolutionary Naturalism
Evolutionary
Naturalism
- Philosophical
naturalism - based on the theory that all phenomena may adequately be
explained by means of physical laws.
Nietzsche applied
the concept of evolution to ethical theory, Marx adapted it to his
socio-political philosophy, Huxley humanized it.
- evolutionary
naturalism attributes a teleology (cosmic
purpose) to nature itself.
Jean de Lamarck (1744-1829) - French zoologist, believed that all forms of life
undergo structural changes when individual members repeatedly use their organs
to cope with the changing environment and that the modified characteristics
thus acquired by the individual are passed on to the offspring.
Darwin argued
that not use or disuse, but the struggle for survival us the decisive factor.
- there is a
process of natural selection whereby those individuals best fitted to overcome
obstacles survive so that their superior characteristics are inherited by
succeeding generations.
Charles Darwin (1809-1882) - Origin of Species (1859), doctrine
of natural selection (or survival of the fittest).
Darwin’s theory of evolution explained the
design or purpose evident in organic life by reference to the mechanical laws
of nature and the process of natural selection; agreed with Hegel as to the
necessity for a historical perspective in order to understand the nature of
things (man must be understood in the light of his animal ancestry).
- Darwin accepted
the theory of Ethical Intuitionism
(ethical principles are innate).
Herbert Spencer (1820-1903) - developed agnosticism as a central doctrine of
evolutionary theory, accepted the reality of the Unknowable; evolution is a
process of natural changes governed by law and manifesting a mystic force which
he considered beyond man’s comprehension.
- we know that
God exists, but we cannot discover specific facts about his powers or
characteristics.
- the entire
universe develops from relative simplicity to complexity as it seeks to
establish equilibrium of all its forces, but once equilibrium is reached they
dissipate and return to an unbalanced state.
- Spencer defined
life as “the continuous adjustment of internal relations to external relations”
- justice,
courage and sympathy have persisted as innate moral principles because they
protected society and contributed to social survival, and were transmitted to
succeeding generations.
Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) - basic philosophy of value theory - “a revaluation of all values”.
The Judeo-Christian system of moral ideals constitutes an inversion of
natural life giving instinctive values, and should be replaced by nature’s
values ie. the Master race.
- Nietzsche
substituted an ethic of power for Judeo-Christian principles; “ethics
of power”: might makes right was a logical consequence of Darwin’s
survival of the fittest.
- advocated
competitive striving to fulfill egoistic instincts and personal achievement
Two types of
morality accompanying two corresponding cultures (1) master morality eg. the
Romans (2) slave morality eg. the Jews
- aristocrats
have become rulers through the exercise of the natural superior abilities
- on the other
hand the slave or subject class have adopted an ethical code emanating from
resentment at their inability to combat the aristocratic class ie. democracy, the principle of equality,
religion with its concept of sin and evil, with the object to reduce the
aristocrat down to their own level.
- Nietzsche’s “Superman” rejects belief in God (“God
is dead”)
Thomas Huxley (1825-1895) - two processes in nature (1) cosmic process of natural evolution (2) ethical process of human evolution
[ethical superior to the cosmic].
- the moral goal
is not “survival of the fittest” but
the education of as many as possible so that they will become worthy of
survival.
Nietzsche’s
individualism is naive in the face of man doing better as a society. Huxley coined the term agnosticism: a doctrine
stating that neither the existence of God nor the character of ultimate reality
is knowable (neither affirms or denies).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)